Skip to main content

How do we calculate BER vs. SNR for real systems?

 

How do we calculate BER vs. SNR for real systems?

In real systems such as BPSK over an AWGN channel, bits are transmitted as signals (e.g., +√P or −√P). Due to noise, the received signal becomes:

y = √P · x + n

where n ∼ N(0, σ²), and x ∈ {−1, +1}.

At the receiver, we perform detection (e.g., using sign detection). The probability of a bit error is given by the Gaussian Q-function:

BER = Q(√(2P / σ²)) = Q(√(2·SNR))

This gives the theoretical BER vs. SNR curve.


BER vs. SNR from Gaussian Q factor

Linear Equalization (e.g., Zero Forcing)

When you're using an equalizer like Zero Forcing (ZF), you get:

  • Effective noise enhancement depending on the channel matrix H
  • The diagonal elements of W = (HHH)−1 (in ZF) tell you how noise variance is scaled after equalization.

So the BER becomes:

BERi = Q( √(2·Î©s / (σ²·Wii)) )

Where:

  • Ωs = symbol power
  • Wii = noise amplification from equalizer
 
The probability of error can be calculated as  

The above example is for a block of size k after zero-forcing equalization. Î©s is the average power, and Wii is the i-th diagonal element of a matrix Wdenotes the symbol estimated error matrix in signal processing.
 

Channel Knowledge in Zero-Forcing (ZF) Equalization

In Zero-Forcing (ZF) equalization, the receiver must know the channel matrix H in order to compute (HHH)−1HH, which is the ZF equalizer.

Channel Estimation is typically performed at the receiver using:

  • Pilot symbols
  • Training sequences

Once the receiver estimates H, it can compute the ZF equalizer.

 

Further Reading

  1.  Theoretical and simulated BER vs. SNR for ASK, FSK, and PSK
  2. BER vs SNR for M-ary QAM, M-ary PSK, QPSK, BPSK, .. 

People are good at skipping over material they already know!

View Related Topics to







Contact Us

Name

Email *

Message *